INTERNATIONAL COUNSEL · BY APPOINTMENT ONLY

Bhubaneswar law firm for foreign clients

Toll-free intake · Consultations by appointment · Intake available in English and Spanish

QUICK ANSWER

Bhubaneswar law firm for foreign clients

Bhubaneswar law firm for foreign clients

Foreign clients in Bhubaneswar who need legal counsel on a matter touching the United States face a single threshold question: whether the legal issue is governed by US law or by Indian law. US law is practiced by attorneys admitted in the United States, and Indian law is practiced by attorneys admitted to an Indian Bar. Law Offices of SRIS, P.C., a US law firm founded in 1997, handles the US-law side for clients in India, including the Bhubaneswar region of Odisha. Mr. Sris, the firm’s owner and founder, is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York, and is the responsible attorney for US-law content. The India-law side is provided by S. Anusuya, Of Counsel, who is enrolled with the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu (Permanent Member, Enrollment No. MS 2331/2016) and not admitted to practice in any US state bar. The firm holds no location in India. This page explains the international instruments that govern US-India legal work and how a matter is divided between US-licensed and India-licensed counsel.

What a law firm for foreign clients does for someone in Bhubaneswar

An attorney may advise only on the law of the jurisdiction where that attorney is licensed, so a cross-border matter is divided between a US-licensed attorney and an India-licensed attorney. When a matter has both a US dimension and an India dimension, the US dimension is handled by the US-licensed attorney and the India dimension by the India-licensed counsel. For example, a client in Bhubaneswar who is negotiating a commercial contract with a US company may need US advice on the law governing the contract and on US enforcement, and India advice on Indian business, corporate, or tax requirements. The two counsel coordinate on the overall matter, but each acts only within the jurisdiction of their own bar admission.

Three international instruments appear regularly in US-India legal coordination. The 1961 Hague Apostille Convention has applied to India since 14 July 2005, so public Indian documents can be authenticated by apostille for US use. The 1965 Hague Service Convention has applied to India since 2007, and because India objected to Article 10, service on a party in India runs through India’s designated Central Authority rather than through the postal channel or a private process server. The 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction does not apply to India, because India is not a contracting party. Each instrument is discussed in further detail in the answers below.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can a foreign client in Bhubaneswar receive legal advice on a US-related matter?

A foreign client in Bhubaneswar receives US-law advice from a US-licensed attorney and Indian-law advice from an India-licensed attorney. Law Offices of SRIS, P.C. provides the US-law side, with Mr. Sris as the responsible attorney, admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York. The Indian-law side is provided by S. Anusuya, Of Counsel, enrolled with the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu (Permanent Member, Enrollment No. MS 2331/2016) and not admitted to practice in any US state bar. Each attorney acts only in the jurisdiction where that attorney is licensed, and the firm collaborates with India-licensed counsel on the India side of a matter.

What is the effect of the 1961 Hague Apostille Convention on documents between India and the US?

The 1961 Hague Apostille Convention applies between India and the United States, permitting apostille authentication of public documents instead of consular legalization. India has been a party to the Convention since 14 July 2005. A public document issued in India, such as a birth certificate, marriage certificate, or corporate registration, can be certified with an apostille by India’s designated competent authority. A public document issued in the United States can be authenticated in the same way for use in India. The apostille certifies the signature and seal on the document; it does not verify the content of the underlying text. Because treaty membership can change, the current status of the contracting parties should be confirmed with the Hague Conference on Private International Law before a client relies on it.

How is legal service of process made on a party located in India?

Service of process on a party in India is made under the 1965 Hague Service Convention, through India’s designated Central Authority. India has been a party to the Convention since 2007, but India has objected to Article 10 of the Convention. The effect of that objection is that service by postal channels and service through private process servers are not permitted. The Convention’s Central Authority mechanism is the route required. The request form and the required contents of a request are specified by the Convention. An attorney preparing service on a party in India should verify India’s current declarations, which can change, at the Hague Conference before filing.

Does the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention apply to a child removed to India?

No. India is not a contracting party to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, so the Convention’s return mechanism does not apply to a child removed to India. When a child is wrongfully removed to or retained in India, the Convention’s return mechanism, which would return the child to the country of the habitual residence, is not available. The remedy for a parent proceeds under Indian law, coordinated by an India-licensed attorney. As of 2026-05, India is not a contracting party; because the status of contracting states changes, the current list should be verified at the Hague Conference.

What replaced the Indian Penal Code effective 1 July 2024?

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 replaced the Indian Penal Code, 1860 effective 1 July 2024. The change brought three new statutes together: the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 replaced the Indian Penal Code, the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 replaced the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Criminal proceedings commencing after the effective date are governed by the new codes. References to the former provisions are now dual-cited to the corresponding new sections. When an act spans the effective date, the determination of which code applies turns on the date of the alleged conduct.

How is a marriage celebrated in India recognized in the United States?

A marriage validly contracted in India is presumptively recognized in the United States under the common-law doctrine of lex loci celebrationis. Under that doctrine, the validity of a marriage is judged by the law of the place where it was celebrated, subject to narrow public-policy exceptions. When the marriage certificate needs to be presented in a US legal context, the 1961 Hague Apostille Convention permits it to be authenticated by apostille, because India is a contracting party. The key condition is that the marriage must have been valid under the law of the place of celebration at the time of the wedding.

Why does a US-India legal matter commonly involve two attorneys?

A US-India legal matter commonly involves two attorneys because no single attorney is licensed to practice in both jurisdictions. The US-licensed attorney advises on US law, including federal and state statutes, civil and criminal matters, and contracts governed by US law. The India-licensed attorney advises on Indian law, including Indian family, corporate, and criminal matters. Each attorney acts only within the bar of the jurisdiction in which they are licensed, and neither renders advice on the other’s law. The two coordinate when a matter has both a US and an India dimension, which is the standard structure for a client with interests in both countries.

Does a foreign client in Bhubaneswar need a law firm physically located in the city?

A foreign client in Bhubaneswar does not need a law firm physically located in the city, because the licensing jurisdiction of the attorney, not the client’s address, determines who can act. Law Offices of SRIS, P.C. holds no location in India. The relevant question is which jurisdiction’s law governs the matter. A client in Bhubaneswar engages US-licensed counsel for the US-law side and India-licensed counsel for the Indian-law side. The division of legal practice is set by the bar admissions of each attorney, not by the geographic location of the client’s home or office.

What documents does a foreign client in India generally gather for a US legal matter?

The documents a foreign client gathers for a US legal matter depend on the nature of the matter. A business matter may require a certificate of incorporation, shareholding records, and commercial contracts. A family matter may require a marriage certificate, a divorce decree, or a birth certificate. A matter before a US court may require evidentiary records relevant to the dispute. For public documents issued in India, the 1961 Hague Apostille Convention permits apostille authentication for US use. The specific list of required documents is identified by the attorney based on the facts of the matter.


Category

Reviewed by Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder.

Attorney advertising. This page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes and their application change and vary by case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome; results may vary. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney. Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.

WhatsAppMessage the firm Call+1 888-437-7747 · 24/7